Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41236645›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025

Radiogenomics: transforming lung cancer care through non-invasive imaging and genomic integration.

Faridoddin Shariaty, Vitalii Pavlov

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Faridoddin ShariatyPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politekhnicheskaya Ulitsa, 29, St. Petersburg, Russia, 195251. Shariaty3@gmail.com.
Vitalii PavlovPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politekhnicheskaya Ulitsa, 29, St. Petersburg, Russia, 195251.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 24-25-00204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiogenomics links quantitative features from routine CT and PET/CT with tumor genomics to non-invasively profile non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This review synthesizes the current workflow-from image acquisition and segmentation to feature extraction and modeling-and emphasizes clinical use cases: triage when tissue is limited, risk stratification, therapy selection (including immunotherapy), and longitudinal monitoring. Despite promising results, clinical translation is constrained by non-standardized imaging/feature pipelines, limited multi-center validation and calibration, vulnerability to data leakage, and challenges in interpretability, uncertainty handling, and software and model governance. We advocate treating genomic burden-tumor mutational burden (TMB), intratumor heterogeneity (ITH), and copy-number alterations (CNA)-as first-class endpoints and covariates, and outline a pattern-aware framework for EGFR T790M to inform surveillance and treatment sequencing. We also provide a practical reporting checklist and a pitfall-to-remedy table to support reproducible, multi-center studies and regulatory-grade documentation. Radiogenomics is best viewed as a complement to biopsy rather than a replacement. Real-world impact now depends on harmonized protocols, leakage-free external validation, explainable and uncertainty-aware models, and integration with multi-omics decision support to deliver reliable, patient-centered lung cancer care.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungGenomicsLung NeoplasmsHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyArtificial intelligenceBiomarkersEGFRLung cancerNSCLCRadiogenomicsRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.