Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41236582›Full record

ArticleCurrent nutrition reports2025

Breastfeeding History and Maternal Body Composition Indicators: A Scoping Review.

Breanna Repp, Yumie Takata

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current nutrition reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Breanna ReppBioHealth Science Program, College of Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Yumie TakataNutrition Program, College of Health, Oregon State University, 103 Milam Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA. yumie.takata@oregonstate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDespite current breastfeeding recommendations often stating postpartum weight loss is a positive outcome of breastfeeding, the research evidence is inconsistent, which may be due to the simplicity of body weight measurement not accounting for body composition. This systematic scoping review aimed to describe the existing literature on breastfeeding history and maternal body composition indicators. RECENT

findingsThrough a literature search using the PubMed database, 1,581 abstracts were obtained, and 33 studies with 80,118 participants were included in this review. History of breastfeeding was often self-reported and evaluated not only as any or no history, but also as type (e.g., exclusive or mixed breastfeeding) and/or duration. Maternal body composition indicator measures include fat/adiposity, muscle, skinfold thickness and circumference which are indicators of body fat, as overall or at specific regions of the body. Approximately three quarters of studies evaluated body composition within three years postpartum, and the remaining evaluated up to 20 years post parturition. Among 29 studies that evaluated for statistical significance, the majority found null associations between breastfeeding and body composition. Most studies that did find statistically significant associations found inverse associations with fat/adiposity, skinfold thickness, and circumference measures assessed at least six months postpartum. Future studies should be conducted to evaluate body composition measured after six months postpartum and include measures of muscle composition.

Indexed as

Body CompositionBreast FeedingAdiposityFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodSkinfold ThicknessBreastfeedingLactationMaternal body compositionPostpartum

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.