SynthesisJournal of neurochemistry2025
Touchscreen and Translational Cognition: A Systematic Review of Trials in Humans and Rodents.
Synthesis in Journal of neurochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Touchscreen and Translational Cognition: A Systematic Review of Trials in Humans and Rodents.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The implementation of touchscreen platforms in co-clinical trials for rodents (i.e., mice and rats) and humans to assess cognitive functions presents an opportunity to overcome barriers present in conventional clinical trials. To better visualize the progress made in this area, this review proposes a systematic synthesis of the comparability of touchscreen cognitive assessment studies applied to both humans and rodents in a co-clinical framework. To accomplish this objective the Ovid, PubMed, Scopus and ScienceDirect databases were searched, in English, and without publication date limit and registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) under the number CRD420250650537. The screening resulted in 5 cross-sectional studies and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) included, which were assessed for methodological quality and risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools. The data acquired in this review reinforce the potential of touchscreen platforms for cognitive assessment across human and rodent models. Behavioral flexibility and visuospatial cognition excelled in terms of comparability. The scarcity of studies and methodological diversity represent significant gaps in the field. Regardless, the available data highlight important opportunities for advancing translational research in cognition with a co-clinical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.