ArticleCancer2025
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in the young (aged 50 years and younger): Divergent clinical and molecular characteristics from the elderly.
Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is largely a disease of individuals older than 50 years; its occurrence in patients aged 50 years and younger is rare. The authors sought to characterize the clinicopathologic features and genetic profile of young-onset (age 50 years and younger) CMML (y-CMML) compared with older onset (older than 50 years) CMML (o-CMML).
methodsThe authors conducted a multi-institutional study of 32 patients with y-CMML and 119 patients with o-CMML, analyzing clinical, morphologic, cytogenetic, and molecular data.
resultsPatients who had y-CMML frequently presented with splenomegaly (59% vs. 11%; p < .001) and hepatomegaly (25% vs. 2%; p < .001) compared with those who had o-CMML. Although the overall incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities was similar, patients who had y-CMML exhibited distinct mutational patterns. PTPN11 mutations were significantly more common in y-CMML (13% vs. 3%; p = .034) than in o-CMML, whereas TET2 (6% vs. 57%; p < .001) and SRSF2 (16% vs. 46%; p = .002) mutations were significantly less frequent. In addition, multi-hit TET2 (6% vs. 34%; p = .002) and TET2-SRSF2 (3% vs. 29%; p = .003) co-mutations were rare in y-CMML. However, the molecular differences did not affect the CMML-specific risk-stratification categories because the clinical outcomes, including overall survival and leukemia-free survival, did not differ between the two groups.
conclusionsCMML in patients aged 50 years and younger is rare and presents with unique clinical and mutational features, suggesting a distinct pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.