Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41236177›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Interactions of Interaural Time and Level Differences in Spatial Hearing with Cochlear Implants.

Sarah Buchholz, Susan Arndt, Jan W H Schnupp, Nicole Rosskothen-Kuhl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A deep learning framework for understanding cochlear implants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah BuchholzNeurobiological Research Laboratory, Section for Experimental and Clinical Otology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-7343
Susan ArndtSection for Experimental and Clinical Otology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Jan W H SchnuppDepartment of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Sha Tin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2604-0057
Nicole Rosskothen-KuhlNeurobiological Research Laboratory, Section for Experimental and Clinical Otology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-5550

Funding

German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) P.R.I.M.E. (Postdoctoral Researchers International Mobility Experience) Fellowship, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013Hong Kong General Research Fund 11100219Hong Kong General Research Fund 11101020Hong Kong General Research Fund 11103823Martin Lee Centre for Innovations in Hearing Health at Macquarie UniversityMED-EL Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria PVFR2019/2Research Commission of the Medical Faculty of the Medical Center at the University of FreiburgShenzhen Science Technology and Innovation Committee JCYJ20180307124024360"Taube Kinder lernen hören e. V."
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Normally hearing humans can localize sound sources quite accurately, with minimum audible angles as small as 1°. To achieve this, these auditory pathways combine information from multiple acoustic cues, including interaural time and interaural level differences (ITDs and ILDs). Patients relying on cochlear implants (CIs) to hear the world do not match normal performance. These deficits are most pronounced in patients with little or no hearing experience early in life, and they appear to result from impaired sensitivity to ITDs, but not to ILDs. However, little is known about how ITD and ILD sensitivities develop and interact in an early deafened auditory system shortly after CI implantation. neonatally deafened rats with bilateral CIs are fitted, and, providing informative ITDs and ILDs from stimulation onset, trained them to lateralize CI stimuli. These animals are exquisitely sensitive to both ILDs and ITDs of CI stimulus pulses, and combined information from both cues in a weighted sum. Importantly, ITDs are weighted heavily in the CI rats, such that only very modest ITDs pointing in one direction can confound quite large ILDs pointing in the opposite direction. This underlines the importance of informative ITDs for maximizing the potential for spatial hearing with CI devices.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsDeafnessHearingSound LocalizationAcoustic StimulationAnimalsCuesHumansRatsauditory neuroscienceauditory prosthesescochlear implants

Identifiers

PMID41236177
PMCPMC12866681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.