SynthesisHeadache2026
Psychosocial factors as predictors of headache chronification: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.
Synthesis in Headache, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/
backgroundThis study aimed to systematically review the literature and summarize, as well as quantitatively pool when feasible, longitudinal evidence regarding psychosocial predictors of headache chronification.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycInfo. The Domain-Determinants-Outcome framework was used to design the search strategy, and studies were screened according to the Patients Intervention Comparator Outcome Timing Setting framework. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was performed, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
resultsThe initial search, including two additional studies identified through hand-searching, yielded 1509 studies after removal of duplicates, of which eight met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies focused on depression as a predictor of migraine chronification and one on depression as a predictor of tension-type headache (TTH) chronification. One study examined anxiety and another studied stress as predictors of both migraine and TTH chronification. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis for depression as predictor; the pooled unadjusted risk ratio was 2.26 (95% confidence interval = 1.69-3.02), the adjusted risk ratio was 1.53 (95% confidence interval = 1.47-1.58), and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessment indicated that depression is a significant predictor of migraine chronification, with a moderate certainty of evidence. For anxiety and stress, the certainty of evidence was rated as moderate. Due to limited data, no firm conclusions could be drawn for other psychosocial factors or for predictors of TTH chronification.
conclusionThere is moderate certainty of evidence supporting depression as a predictor of migraine chronification. For anxiety and stress in relation to migraine and TTH, the certainty of evidence is moderate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.