ArticleWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2025
Domain-specific embedding models for hydrology and environmental sciences: enhancing semantic retrieval and question answering.
Article in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reconceptualizing Scoring Reliability Through Linguistic Similarity.Educational and psychological measurement · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong performance across natural language processing tasks, yet their general-purpose embeddings often fall short in domains with specialized terminology and complex syntax, such as hydrology and environmental science. This study introduces HydroEmbed, a suite of open-source sentence embedding models fine-tuned for four QA formats: multiple-choice (MCQ), true/false (TF), fill-in-the-blank (FITB), and open-ended questions. Models were trained on the HydroLLM Benchmark, a domain-aligned dataset combining textbook and scientific article content. Fine-tuning strategies included MultipleNegativesRankingLoss, CosineSimilarityLoss, and TripletLoss, selected to match each task's semantic structure. Evaluation was conducted on a held-out set of 400 textbook-derived QA pairs, using top-k similarity-based context retrieval and GPT-4o-mini for answer generation. Results show that the fine-tuned models match or exceed performance of strong proprietary and open-source baselines, particularly in FITB and open-ended tasks, where domain alignment significantly improves semantic precision. The MCQ/TF model also achieved competitive accuracy. These findings highlight the value of task- and domain-specific embedding models for building robust retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines and intelligent QA systems in scientific domains. This work represents a foundational step toward HydroLLM, a domain-specialized language model ecosystem for environmental sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41236066What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.