Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41236062›Full record

ArticleWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2025

ANN-based prediction for a sustainable decision model on a combined sewer overflow screen: using a conceptual approach.

Ho Tse

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ho TseAtkinsRealis UK Limited, Woodcote, Ashley Road, Epsom, UK E-mail: jeff.tse@atkinsrealis.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2116-1644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combined sewer overflow (CSO) screens are critical components of sewer and drainage networks, separating sewer solids from overflow spills before they reach receiving waters. Selecting suitable and sustainable CSO screening devices, however, remains a complex task. This process has traditionally depended on conventional design calculations, technical guidance from screen manufacturers and precedents from past projects. Inappropriate screen selections have led to adverse effects on water quality and public health, due to insufficient screening capacity, the unpredictable behaviour of sewer solids of varying densities, low trapping efficiency, frequent screen blinding or high equipment failure rates, particularly at unmanned or remote sites. This paper presents a design methodology for screen selection and formulates an input-output relationship model. Using 50 screen project data, a framework has been proposed to construct a predictive model that integrates sustainability criteria, lessons learnt from historical applications and artificial neural network (ANN) techniques. A Levenberg-Marquardt-based ANN was developed and trained to identify optimal selection between 2 categories of screen solutions, encompassing 12 screen types - 3 within non-powered self-cleaning and 9 within the powered screen category. The framework aims to provide an initial proof-of-concept evidence with a supplementary decision-support tool, enabling design engineers to make intelligent, resilient and sustainable choices in screen application.

Indexed as

Drainage, SanitaryNeural Networks, ComputerSewageWaste Disposal, FluidModels, TheoreticalSewagecombined sewer overflowneural networkscreensustainability criteria

Identifiers

PMID41236062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.