ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2026
The Changing Landscape of the Providers of Home-Based Medical Care in Traditional Medicare.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing the measurement of caregiver impact: Data collection priorities aligned with caregiver, health technology assessment, and policy stakeholders.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Review
- The Changing Landscape of the Providers of Home-Based Medical Care in Traditional Medicare.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs more older adults become homebound, home-based medical care (HBMC) has increased, but little is known about the HBMC workforce. This study analyzes national data on the size and structural features of HBMC providers from 2016 to 2022.
methodsWe analyzed annual primary care data for all traditional Medicare enrollees, classifying visits as HBMC (private residence or assisted living facility [ALF]) or non-HBMC (office or telemedicine). We evaluated trends in HBMC providers and visits by HBMC practice exclusivity (only-HBMC or both HBMC and non-HBMC), care setting (private residence, ALF), provider type (physician, nurse practitioner [NP], physician assistant [PA]), and visit volume. We assessed geographic variation in HBMC's share of primary care and payment differences between HBMC and non-HBMC services.
resultsIn 2022, 16,125 of 304,326 (5%) primary care clinicians delivered 5.6 million HBMC visits, with most visits (66%) in ALFs. From 2016 to 2022, HBMC providers increased by 40% and visits by 29%. The proportion of only-HBMC providers rose from 50.2% to 61.7%, whereas providers with volume > 1000 visits/year fell from 46.8% to 38.9%. The increase in providers was higher in private residences (49%) than ALFs (33%), though average provider volume decreased in private residences (-24%) and rose in ALFs (7%). NPs among HBMC providers increased from 42.2% to 63.0%, PAs from 6.6% to 8.2%, and physicians dropped from 51.3% to 28.9%. HBMC's share of all visits increased from 3.9% to 5.4%, driven more by ALF visits. Non-HBMC service payments grew faster than those for HBMC services.
conclusionsAgainst the backdrop of an expanding HBMC workforce and rising visit volumes from 2016 to 2022, our findings highlight significant shifts in the structural composition of providers. These shifts emphasize the need for ongoing research to address their implications for access, quality, and outcomes in homebound older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.