Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235919›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026

Real-World Outcomes of Elacestrant in ER+, HER2-, ESR1-Mutant Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Hope S Rugo, Virginia Kaklamani, Heather McArthur, Seth A Wander, William Gradishar, Reshma Mahtani, Mark Pegram, Maryam Lustberg, Elyse Swallow, Jessica Maitland and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hope S RugoCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.ORCID 0000-0001-6710-4814
Virginia KaklamaniUniversity of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-3313-8458
Heather McArthurUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-0201-3871
Seth A WanderMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-4127-4708
William GradisharRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-2772-3140
Reshma MahtaniBaptist Health Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-7711-8627
Mark PegramStanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0002-9743-8118
Maryam LustbergYale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-8559-5645
Elyse SwallowAnalysis Group, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-1634-142X
Jessica MaitlandAnalysis Group, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-6804-319X
Sebastian KlossMenarini Group, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0730-2645
Tomer WassermanMenarini Group, New York, New York.ORCID 0009-0007-2468-8371
Sara M TolaneyDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-5940-8671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe EMERALD trial led to the approval of elacestrant for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1)-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with disease progression following at least one line of endocrine therapy (ET). Subgroup analyses provided evidence suggesting that elacestrant enables ET sequencing in the second line before other targeted combinations, which could delay chemotherapy-based regimens. EXPERIMENTAL

designThis study used claims data from the Komodo Research Dataset linked with Foundation Medicine Inc. clinical genomic data from patients with estrogen receptor+/HER2- mBC harboring an ESR1 mutation treated with elacestrant. The primary outcome measure was time to next treatment (TTNT).

resultsAmong 306 patients, 93.8% had prior ET ± cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor for ≥12 months, 50.0% had prior chemotherapy, and 72.2% had prior fulvestrant. Median TTNT (mTTNT) was 8.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.3-13.0] in patients with 1 to 2 prior lines and 7.5 months (95% CI, 7.1-9.9) in those with ≥3 prior lines of ET. In patients with coexisting ESR1- and PI3K-pathway-mutated tumors, mTTNT was 6.3 months (95% CI, 4.8-7.9). mTTNT was 7.9 months (95% CI, 7.1-9.8) in all patients and was also sustained in patients with no prior fulvestrant [12.9 months (95% CI, 7.2-not reached)], no prior chemotherapy [8.4 months (95% CI, 7.1-13.3)], visceral metastasis [7.9 months (95% CI, 7.0-9.9)], and liver metastases [7.2 months (95% CI, 6.3-9.0)].

conclusionsElacestrant demonstrated a durable benefit in real-world clinical practice, particularly in earlier lines and in patients with prolonged prior ET exposure. Despite coexisting ESR1 and PI3K pathway mutations, TTNT remained clinically meaningful, reinforcing the role of elacestrant in personalized ET sequencing strategies prior to chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, or targeted combinations. See related article by Lloyd et al., p. 169.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogen Receptor alphaMutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisReceptors, EstrogenTreatment OutcomeERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID41235919
PMCPMC12770937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.