ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Scar Quality After Burns in Relation to Skin Type, Classified by Device-Based Colour Measurement, as an Alternative for the Fitzpatrick Questionnaire.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scar Quality After Burns in Relation to Skin Type, Classified by Device-Based Colour Measurement, as an Alternative for the Fitzpatrick Questionnaire.International wound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine if skin types can be accurately assessed via melanin scores measured with a colormeter, and whether scar characteristics of people with different skin types are different at various stages of healing. Melanin scores of a Cortex DSM Colormeter were validated against the Fitzpatrick skin type questionnaire in healthy volunteers and unaffected skin of burn and scar patients (N = 137) to determine melanin index cut-offs per skin type. Scar quality in children and adults at 3, 6, and 12 months post-burn using DSM Colormeter and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was analysed in a cohort of > 1000 patients. Data from 137 individuals showed good correlation between melanin index and Fitzpatrick skin types (Spearman's rho: 0.72 Dermaspectrometer, 0.69 DSM II; p < 0.0001). Scar characteristics varied by skin type for erythema, pigmentation, vascularization, and overall POSAS scores. Children had significantly thicker scars than adults, regardless of skin type, varying from 0.3 to 1.4 points difference on the observer scale at 12 months post burn. We conclude that skin type can be objectively classified using the melanin index, showing a strong correlation with the Fitzpatrick questionnaire. Skin type influences scar outcomes, especially pigmentation and vascularization. Children, particularly those with lighter skin, tend to develop thicker scars than adults. Recognising these differences can improve scar management and patient education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.