Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235870›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Visual field of the ferret (Mustela putorius furo), rat (Rattus norvegicus), and tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri).

Jacob M Morris, Esteban Fernández-Juricic, Caryn E Plummer, Bret A Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacob M MorrisCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Esteban Fernández-JuricicDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Caryn E PlummerCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Bret A MooreCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To describe the visual field of three common model species in vision science to understand the organization of their visual perceptual experience and contribute to continued studies of visual processing. Visual fields were measured using an ophthalmoscopic reflex technique in four common ferrets, four albino rats, and six northern tree shrews. Animals were anesthetized to avoid stress and the midpoint between their eyes was centered inside a spherical space. A rotating perimetric arm was manipulated in 10° increments around the head. At each increment, direct ophthalmoscopy was used to visualize limits of the retinal reflex for each eye, the overlap being the binocular visual field. Mean binocularity in the horizontal plane was 63.7 ± 5.1°, 79.1 ± 7.4°, and 53.6 ± 12.0° in the ferret, rat, and shrew, respectively. Maximum mean binocularity was 69.0 ± 1.6° in the ferret, 90.0 ± 3.1° in the rat, and 53.6 ± 12.2° in the shrew, located at 10° above, 40° above, and at the horizontal plane, respectively. Binocularity extended to 160°, 200°, and 180° in the sagittal plane in the ferret, rat, and shrew, respectively, from at least below the nose to above the head in all animals. Establishing the extent of the visual field accessible to the retina provides insight into the egocentric perceptual experience of animals. In describing the visual field, we provide a reference for the representation of the visual space in different cortical and retinal regions, many of which represent specific subregions of the visual field.

Indexed as

FerretsTupaiaVisual FieldsAnimalsMaleOphthalmoscopyRatsTupaiidaeVision, Binocular

Identifiers

PMID41235870
PMCPMC12629130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.