ArticleJournal of vision2025
Visual field of the ferret (Mustela putorius furo), rat (Rattus norvegicus), and tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri).
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe the visual field of three common model species in vision science to understand the organization of their visual perceptual experience and contribute to continued studies of visual processing. Visual fields were measured using an ophthalmoscopic reflex technique in four common ferrets, four albino rats, and six northern tree shrews. Animals were anesthetized to avoid stress and the midpoint between their eyes was centered inside a spherical space. A rotating perimetric arm was manipulated in 10° increments around the head. At each increment, direct ophthalmoscopy was used to visualize limits of the retinal reflex for each eye, the overlap being the binocular visual field. Mean binocularity in the horizontal plane was 63.7 ± 5.1°, 79.1 ± 7.4°, and 53.6 ± 12.0° in the ferret, rat, and shrew, respectively. Maximum mean binocularity was 69.0 ± 1.6° in the ferret, 90.0 ± 3.1° in the rat, and 53.6 ± 12.2° in the shrew, located at 10° above, 40° above, and at the horizontal plane, respectively. Binocularity extended to 160°, 200°, and 180° in the sagittal plane in the ferret, rat, and shrew, respectively, from at least below the nose to above the head in all animals. Establishing the extent of the visual field accessible to the retina provides insight into the egocentric perceptual experience of animals. In describing the visual field, we provide a reference for the representation of the visual space in different cortical and retinal regions, many of which represent specific subregions of the visual field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.