ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Comparative Investigation of the Retinal Phenotype of Three Mouse Models of Alzheimer's Disease With Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retinal OCT Parameters and Physiological Dynamics as an Effect of Anesthesia in C57BL/6J Mice.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Mouse models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are designed to replicate a multitude of pathologies. However, a direct comparison between models is virtually impossible due to vastly differing data acquisition and image processing protocols. Based on the hypothesis that a well-defined experimental framework is key to determining subtle differences in their retinal phenotype, we use a standardized anesthesia protocol, the same optical coherence tomography (OCT) system and image processing pipeline to compare commercially available AD mouse models. Methods: Two models of amyloidosis (5xFAD and APP/PS1) and one of tau pathology (PS19) were investigated (age = 42.5 ± 6.5 weeks). A high-resolution OCT prototype was used to image the retina of animals under isoflurane anesthesia. Retinal OCT parameters were mapped and compared. Results: Total retinal thickness was comparable for the amyloidosis models (transgenic [tg] and non-transgenic [ntg] APP/PS1 = 209.3 µm and 210.7 µm, and tg and ntg 5xFAD = 212.1 µm and 211.2 µm), but, on average, approximately 17% thicker for the tg and ntg PS19 mice (256.4 µm and 236.8 µm). APP/PS1 mice had approximately 10 µm thicker outer retinal layers (ORL) in tg and ntg models and 10 µm thinner inner retinal layers (IRL) in comparison to 5xFAD mice. PS19 mice had between 10 and 20 µm thicker IRL and ORL than the amyloidosis models. The vascular density in superficial vascular, intermediate, and deep capillary plexuses differed significantly for 5xFAD mice. Conclusions: Despite standardized conditions, the retinal parameters were not constant across different mouse models of AD, indicating fundamental phenotypical differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.