Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235749›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2025

The Microalga Chlorella vulgaris Supplements as a Factor Increasing the Survival of Potentially Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria Under Environmental Stress Conditions.

Patryk Adamski, Lucyna Kłębukowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patryk AdamskiDepartment of Food Microbiology, Meat Technology and Chemistry, Faculty of Food Science, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2772-9208
Lucyna KłębukowskaDepartment of Food Microbiology, Meat Technology and Chemistry, Faculty of Food Science, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0444-1132

Funding

Polish Minister of Science under the Regional Initiative of Excellence Program.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies show that Chlorella vulgaris, due to its richness in nutrients, exhibits protective properties for probiotic strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). This creates an opportunity to produce more effective probiotics. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two supplements of C. vulgaris on the growth and survival of LAB exposed to adverse stress factors (pH = 3, the presence of 0.2% and 0.5% bile salts). Survival was evaluated after 0 and 6 h of culture in the adverse stress environment. The results obtained, indicated statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences in the obtained growth and survival of the tested groups of LAB in the presence of C. vulgaris and the control sample. The study found that LAB showed the lowest survival rate in the presence of 0.5% bile salts, regardless of the culture variant. The results obtained suggest that the effect of C. vulgaris on the growth and survival of LAB strains depends on various factors, including the culture environment, the source of isolation of the strain and the chemical composition and nutritional content of the preparation. The results confirm the protective nature of C. vulgaris in the presence of high concentrations of bile salts and low pH.

Indexed as

Chlorella vulgarisLactobacillalesMicroalgaeMicrobial ViabilityProbioticsStress, PhysiologicalBile Acids and SaltsCulture MediaHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationBile Acids and SaltsCulture Mediaalgaefunctional foodslactobacillus spprobioticstress factorssuperfoodssurvival

Identifiers

PMID41235749
PMCPMC12616498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.