Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235708›Full record

Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2026

Integration of a WASH Component in the Standard National Protocol for Treatment of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Children Aged 6-59 Months in Northern Senegal-A Costing Study.

Bibata Wassonguema, Maily Lê-Lacanette, Laura Braun, Matar Ba, Françoise Siroma, Albert Emile Cabo, Antonio Vargas Brizuela, Moustapha Seye, Jean Lapègue, Alexandre Devort and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bibata WassonguemaAction Contre la Faim, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2315-5964
Maily Lê-LacanetteAction Contre la Faim, Paris, France.
Laura BraunDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Matar BaAction Contre la Faim, Dakar, Senegal.
Françoise SiromaAction Contre la Faim, Dakar, Senegal.
Albert Emile CaboAction Contre la Faim, Dakar, Senegal.
Antonio Vargas BrizuelaAction Contre la Faim, Valencia, Spain.
Moustapha SeyeAction Contre la Faim, Valencia, Spain.
Jean LapègueAction Contre la Faim, Paris, France.
Alexandre DevortAction Contre la Faim, Dakar, Senegal.
Oliver CummingDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Dieynaba S N'DiayeAction Contre la Faim, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) affects 12.2 million children globally. Integrating a water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) kit in outpatient SAM treatment can improve recovery rates by preventing WASH-related diseases and complications, but its cost at scale remains unknown. This study estimates the cost of integrating a WASH kit, composed of chlorine-based water treatment, safe water storage with a lid, soap, and a hygiene promotion component into Senegal's national protocol for treating uncomplicated SAM. This costing study was nested within the TISA randomised controlled trial, which evaluated the addition of a WASH component to standard SAM treatment for children aged 6-59 months. Cost data were collected from 660 participants enroled between December 2020 and December 2021. We took a societal perspective and used a micro-costing approach to estimate direct medical, non-medical and indirect costs. The WASH component led to a 2021 international $105.32 additional cost per child treated, with the WASH kit, transportation and management representing $33.03. Sensitisation to hygiene and water treatment cost $13.46 at health posts and $29.63 for two at-home visits. No additional out-of-pocket expenses were incurred by households, but $1.58 in opportunity costs (income loss) was observed. Human resources were the main cost driver for the WASH component, exceeding the human resources for standard SAM treatment. The total societal cost per child treated was $338.77, ranging from $238.09 to $517.29 in sensitivity analysis, with the SAM treatment representing 69% ($233.40) of this total cost. The main expense for this component was Ready-to-Use-Therapeutic Food (RUTF) ($154.39). The absence of additional costs for households induced by the WASH component is encouraging, as it suggests that it would not represent an obstacle to integration into the national protocol. We produced a robust and comprehensive cost estimate for integrating a WASH kit and hygiene promotion into Senegal's SAM treatment protocol. This increased the treatment cost by 45% which was lower than estimates from a previous study. Results inform budget planning and support future cost-effectiveness analyses of integrating WASH interventions into SAM protocols.

Indexed as

HygieneSanitationSevere Acute MalnutritionChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleSenegalchild nutritioncommunity‐based management of acute malnutrition (CMAM)costing studyNorthern Senegaloutpatient treatmentsevere acute malnutrition (SAM)water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH)

Identifiers

PMID41235708
PMCPMC12616514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.