Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235599›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026

Outcomes of Sequential Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Retreatment After Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Takanori Ito, Shigeo Shimose, Issei Saeki, Yasuto Takeuchi, Joji Tani, Tetsu Tomonari, Ryu Sasaki, Kyo Sasaki, Satoru Kakizaki, Takeshi Hatanaka and 15 more

Abstract readClinical StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Takanori ItoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Shigeo ShimoseDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2068-8386
Issei SaekiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Yasuto TakeuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Joji TaniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan.
Tetsu TomonariDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8484-9866
Ryu SasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-7377
Kyo SasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
Satoru KakizakiDepartment of Clinical Research, NHO Takasaki General Medical Center, Takasaki, Gunma, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0224-7093
Takeshi HatanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gunma Saiseikai Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-285X
Hideki IwamotoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5688-1335
Norikazu TanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Takafumi YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9904-1894
Atsushi NaganumaDepartment of Gastroenterology, NHO Takasaki General Medical Center, Takasaki, Gunma, Japan.
Tomotake ShironoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Yuki KanayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gunma Saiseikai Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.
Hisamitsu MiyaakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8067-4376
Sohji NishinaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
Tetsuji TakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Hideki KobaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan.
Motoyuki OtsukaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Taro TakamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6689-4989
Takumi KawaguchiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7064-4325
Hiroki KawashimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3720-781X
Hepatology InVestigator Experts in Japan (HIVE‐J) Study Group

Funding

Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 22K15962Research from the National Center for Global Health and Medicine 23A1002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimData on sequential immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) retreatment following initial atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez + Bev) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential ICI retreatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

methodsOf 835 patients with uHCC treated with Atez + Bev, 75 who underwent ICI retreatment after initial Atez + Bev therapy were included in this multicenter retrospective study that assessed the efficacy and safety of ICIs.

resultsThe participants received one of three sequential retreatments with ICI regimens: durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n = 58), retreatment with Atez + Bev (n = 15), and durvalumab monotherapy (n = 2). The objective response rates (ORRs)/disease control rates (DCRs) for the initial Atez + Bev and sequential ICI retreatment were 34.7%/89.3% and 18.7%/54.7%, respectively. No significant differences in antitumor response were observed among the three ICI retreatment regimens. Patients who achieved a good antitumor response (≥ stable disease) following retreatment showed a significantly longer overall survival. Multivariate analysis identified prior objective response to Atez + Bev as an independent predictor of disease control after retreatment (odds ratio: 3.79, p = 0.016). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring corticosteroids occurred in 26.7% of the patients during ICI retreatment, with enterocolitis and rash being the most common. The recurrence rate of irAEs was 15.4% in patients with previous steroid-requiring irAEs.

conclusionsSequential ICI retreatment may be a viable therapeutic option for selected patients with uHCC, particularly those with a favorable response to prior Atez + Bev. Although less effective than first-line therapy, careful patient selection and monitoring ensure efficacy with acceptable safety.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCarcinoma, HepatocellularImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLiver NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetreatmentRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedatezolizumabBevacizumabdurvalumabImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorstremelimumabatezolizumabbevacizumabimmune checkpoint inhibitorsequential ICI treatmentunresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41235599
PMCPMC12783083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.