Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235465›Full record

Observational studyEpileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape2026

Volumetric MRI study of the brain in patients with neurocysticercosis and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

Jaisa Quedi Araújo, Bruna da Silveira Arruda, Sandra Polita, Maurício Anés, Thiago Junqueira Ribeiro de Rezende, Matheus de Lima Ruffini, Adolfo Moraes de Souza, Jordana Soares Chaves, Fabiano Reis, Marino Muxfeldt Bianchin and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jaisa Quedi AraújoHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4396-2100
Bruna da Silveira ArrudaHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Sandra PolitaHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Maurício AnésHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Thiago Junqueira Ribeiro de RezendeFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Matheus de Lima RuffiniHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6885-8646
Adolfo Moraes de SouzaHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0786-5571
Jordana Soares ChavesHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Fabiano ReisFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2256-4379
Marino Muxfeldt BianchinHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Juliana Ávila DuarteHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4973-2889

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeurocysticercosis (NCC) is a common parasitic infection of the central nervous system and a known cause of focal epilepsy. Its potential role in triggering or contributing to mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS) is suggested, but the impact on brain volumetry remains unclear. This study aimed to assess volumetric differences in the brain, with a particular focus on the hippocampus and temporal lobes, in patients with NCC, MTLE, MTLE-HS, and their combinations.

methodsThis was an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective, single-center exploratory study including five groups: healthy controls; isolated MTLE; isolated NCC; MTLE-HS; and MTLE-HS combined with NCC (MTLE-HS plus NCC). All participants had at least one magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination suitable for volumetric post-processing. Volumetric analysis was performed on cerebral cortex regions (frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes), cerebellum, total and white matter limbic system, amygdala, hippocampus, and thalamus using the T1 MultiAtlas Segmentation tool (Brain GPS©). We also assessed sensitivity by estimating the minimum detectable difference from adjusted models and performed an exploratory analysis of NCC lesion topography with Welch t-tests on lobar/subcortical volumes.

resultsAfter adjusting for age and sex, no significant group differences were found in hippocampal or temporal lobe volumetrics (all p > .10). Effect sizes were small (partial η SIGNIFICANCE: The findings indicate that NCC, whether isolated or combined with MTLE-HS, does not cause significant alterations in brain volume. This suggests the absence of an additive or synergistic effect of NCC on brain morphostructural changes in patients with MTLE-HS. These results contribute to understanding the pathophysiology of epilepsy related to NCC and hippocampal sclerosis, supporting that volumetric brain changes may not underlie their association.

Indexed as

BrainEpilepsy, Temporal LobeHippocampusNeurocysticercosisAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultmagnetic resonance imagingmesial temporal lobe epilepsyneurocysticercosisvolumetric cerebral

Identifiers

PMID41235465
PMCPMC12964183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.