Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235419›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2025

Characterisation of a university student sample with a lifetime history of non-suicidal self-injury: mixed-methods analysis of stress factors, coping mechanisms and reasons for self-injury.

Elena von Perponcher, Irina Jarvers, Angelika Ecker, Elisa Heidingsfelder, Stephanie Kandsperger, Romuald Brunner, Daniel Schleicher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena von PerponcherInstitute for Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Irina JarversDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, https://ror.org/01eezs655University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8414-2895
Angelika EckerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, https://ror.org/01eezs655University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Elisa HeidingsfelderDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, https://ror.org/01eezs655University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Stephanie KandspergerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, https://ror.org/01eezs655University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3925-7615
Romuald BrunnerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, https://ror.org/01eezs655University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Daniel SchleicherDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, https://ror.org/01eezs655University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4518-3512

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) displays an alarmingly high prevalence rate among university students, placing them at high risk for adverse long-term outcomes, including suicide.

aimsThis study aimed to achieve a better understanding of factors contributing to NSSI in university student populations by examining reasons for NSSI and histories of stressful events and coping strategies.

methodA total of 185 university students with a lifetime history of NSSI were assessed for depressive symptoms and NSSI characteristics. They completed three questionnaires on NSSI reasons, stressful events and coping strategies during childhood and adolescence. Each questionnaire included an 'others' option combined with an open-ended response box. After descriptive analysis of the closed questions, these open-ended responses were qualitatively categorised and analysed as predictors of depression severity and NSSI continuation from adolescence into adulthood.

resultsQualitative analysis identified eight, five and ten categories from the open-ended responses for NSSI reasons, stressful events and coping strategies, respectively, with substantial to almost perfect interrater reliability. Two qualitative reason categories, one stressful event category and two coping strategy categories significantly predicted depression severity (

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the value of mixed-methods approaches. Stable qualitative categories highlight the need to capture individual variations in NSSI-related factors. It emphasises trauma-related stressors due to their influence on depression severity and persistence of NSSI into adulthood.

Indexed as

copingdepressive disordersNon-suicidal self-injuryqualitative researchtrauma and stressor-related disorders

Identifiers

PMID41235419
PMCPMC12641407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.