ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
Fear Avoidance after Concussion Tool (FACT): patient-reported outcome measure development and content validation.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: No valid patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) exist to evaluate fear avoidance behaviour following concussion. This study developed a new PROM to evaluate fear avoidance behaviour following concussion and assessed the PROM content validity. Design: PROM development was performed using a qualitative study, and content validation was performed using a mixed-methods approach. Methods: The development phase consisted of compiling potentially relevant items (eg, questions) from other PROMs proposed to measure fear avoidance before proceeding to a series of one-on-one semistructured interviews with patient and professional participants. The content validity (relevance, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness) of the PROM was first assessed by professional participants using an online survey, before further assessment by patient participants during one-on-one semistructured interviews. Results: For PROM development, seven patient participants (n=4 men) and seven professional participants (n=4 men) from six clinical professions were included, who generated 119 potentially relevant items under seven distinct domains. Key themes that emerged during development were a strong preference for a short PROM, with a simple scale, that has clinical utility. 38 professional participants (47% women) and seven patient participants completed the content validation. Thus, the final PROM (Fear Avoidance after Concussion Tool or FACT) has content validity, consists of 28 items, with four items per domain. The seven domains of the FACT are: general, physical, psychological, hypervigilance, cognitive, social and work. Conclusion: The FACT has been developed to evaluate fear avoidance behaviour following concussion and has content validity. Future research should evaluate other measurement properties before implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.