ArticleJPRAS open2025
Educational impact of a cost-efficient porcine model for toe amputation simulation training: Enhancing amputation education.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Undergraduate amputation education is underrepresented, limiting exposure to training. Porcine simulation models, known for their anatomical similarity to humans and cost-efficiency, have gained popularity in surgical education. This study evaluates the educational impact of a low-cost porcine toe amputation simulation model in enhancing theoretical knowledge, technical skills, and anatomical understanding. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted through a structured workshop-including a didactic lecture on anatomy and surgical principles, followed by hands-on practice with porcine models. Pre-and post-workshop surveys assessed theoretical knowledge, surgical confidence, instrument familiarity, and post-operative management using Likert scales and knowledge-based assessments. Technical skills were evaluated using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS). Statistical analysis employed Wilcoxon Signed-rank and Mcnemar's test. Results: A total of twenty seven participants (24 medical students and three resident doctors) with no prior toe amputation experience participated. Theoretical knowledge improved significantly from 1.52 ± 0.98 to 3.81 ± 1.04 ( Conclusion: The simulation model significantly improves knowledge and technical skills. Future workshops could incorporate psychological and physiological care to provide a comprehensive learning experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.