ArticlePhotoacoustics2025
Radiomics-driven perfusion prediction in clinical photoacoustic foot imaging.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of tissue perfusion is essential for managing chronic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease. While photoacoustic (PA) imaging enables high-resolution visualization of vascular structures, current perfusion evaluation methods are limited. We propose a fully automated radiomics-based framework for predicting perfusion conditions using single-wavelength clinical PA foot imaging. Radiomics features were extracted from both raw radiofrequency (RF) signals and reconstructed maximum amplitude projection (MAP) images. After reproducibility testing and statistical filtering, features were ranked using a combined minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) and ReliefF approach. A k-nearest neighbors ensemble model trained on eight selected features achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (training) and 0.94 (test). The selected features corresponded with physiological indicators such as vessel density, tissue structure, and vascular discontinuity. This study demonstrates a reliable and interpretable method for perfusion assessment in PA imaging with strong clinical potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.