Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235292›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Pilot Study of British and Irish Junior Doctors in Auckland, New Zealand, Using a Questionnaire to Explore Motivations and Intentions.

Katherine Makris, Yvonne Chan, Christopher Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine MakrisGeneral Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, NZL.
Yvonne ChanMedical Education, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, NZL.
Christopher LewisRespiratory Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, NZL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction As dissatisfaction grows amongst junior doctors working in the NHS and Health Service Executive (HSE, Ireland's national public health system), an increasing number of them are reported to be considering leaving the UK and Ireland. Over the last few decades, New Zealand has been an emigration destination for many doctors. This preliminary study of British and Irish junior doctors working in Auckland, New Zealand, aimed to explore their motivations for leaving the UK and Ireland and discover if their expectations had matched their experiences, in order to aid further research across the country. Methods An online survey was sent to all British and Irish house officer doctors working in public hospitals in the Auckland region in March 2025. Responses were analysed with descriptive statistics. Results The survey was sent to 55 doctors and there were 23 responses. Many reported dissatisfaction with working life, more so in the NHS and HSE than Te Whatu Ora (New Zealand's national public health system). Twenty-one out of 23 (91%) respondents had moved to New Zealand seeking a better work-life balance, however some felt they had less free time working in Te Whatu Ora. Nineteen out of 23 respondents (83%) intended to leave New Zealand, mainly to be closer to family and friends. Conclusion Despite most of this cohort of British and Irish junior doctors moving to New Zealand for a better work-life balance, some felt they worked more hours in Te Whatu Ora. Most still intended to return home, regardless of potential changes in Te Whatu Ora. Further research across the country is needed to determine if these findings are representative of all British and Irish junior doctors in New Zealand.

Indexed as

junior doctor trainingnational health service (nhs)new zealandphysician recruitmentphysician satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID41235292
PMCPMC12605562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.