ArticleCureus2025
Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Quadrupled Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Minimally Invasive Bone Preserving Approach with Promising Functional Outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the primary stabilisers of the knee, and injury to it often requires surgical intervention. ACL injuries are common sports injuries that tend to occur during sudden deceleration, pivoting, or landing movements, resulting in knee instability and decreased functionality. Different graft options have been proposed over the years for reconstructing the ACL. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the short-term functional, clinical stability, and biomechanical (muscle strength) outcomes following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using a quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis autograft performed in a single tertiary care centre. Methodology We conducted a prospective study involving 40 patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction at a tertiary care centre in India. The study was conducted from March 2022 to May 2024. The surgical technique involved harvesting and quadrupling the hamstring (semitendinosus and gracilis) tendons, with arthroscopic fixation using an adjustable-loop device on the femur and a bioabsorbable interference screw on the tibia. All patients followed an accelerated rehabilitation protocol. The outcomes were assessed at a mean follow-up of 14.2 months using the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, isokinetic dynamometry, and clinical stability tests. Results The results were positive and demonstrated a significant improvement in knee function (p < 0.001). The mean Lysholm score increased from approximately 49 preoperatively to 95 at the final follow-up. Ninety percent of patients achieved an excellent outcome, and the remaining 10% achieved a good outcome. All patients demonstrated normal knee stability on clinical testing. Ninety-five per cent returned to their pre-injury level of work or sports nine months postoperatively. The most common presenting complaint was the knee "giving way" or instability of the knee joint. While 40% of patients reported mild, transient anterior knee pain, there were no cases of graft failure, infection, or other serious complications. Conclusion Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with a quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft provides excellent short-term outcomes and is a reliable technique for restoring knee stability and function. Further studies are required to evaluate objective outcomes and long-term sequelae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.