ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Nurses' well-being and its relationship with quality of nursing work life at Alsalam and Al Haram Hospitals, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Emotional labor and occupational well-being among endoscopy healthcare workers: a moderated serial mediation model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nurses' well-being is a vital factor influencing healthcare quality, patient safety, and workforce sustainability. In Saudi Arabia, nurses in public hospitals often encounter high workloads, emotional stress, and limited managerial support, potentially affecting both their mental health and professional performance. Aims: This study aimed to assess the well-being of nurses working at Alsalam and Al Haram hospitals in Saudi Arabia and to examine its relationship with the Quality of Nursing Work Life (QNWL). Methods: A cross-sectional census study was conducted in 2025 involving 169 registered nurses from the two hospitals. Data were collected using structured interview questionnaires incorporating three validated tools: The Nurse's Well-Being Assessment Tool (NWAT), the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), and the QNWL Scale. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25. Results: Nurses reported moderate overall well-being (mean NWAT score: 62.20 ± 2.9), with notably low scores in work-life balance and emotional/mental health. The WHO-5 index indicated low emotional well-being (mean: 12.70 ± 2.2), reflecting significant emotional distress. The QNWL scores were generally poor (mean: 91.02 ± 6.0), particularly in the areas of managerial support and work-life balance. Moderate scores were observed in nurse-physician relationships and professional fulfillment. A significant positive correlation was found between well-being (NWAT and WHO-5) and QNWL scores ( Conclusion: Nurses at both hospitals face multiple well-being challenges that negatively impact their quality of work life. Interventions focusing on mental health support, enhanced managerial engagement, and improved work-life balance are essential. These efforts are crucial for advancing workforce well-being and aligning with the healthcare objectives of Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.