ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
The impact of greening interventions in school grounds on social behavior and cognitive performance among primary school children.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reframing nature connectedness as a psychosocial mechanism for youth mental health.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Green spaces have been identified as beneficial for children's mental health, as well as cognitive performance, however, less is known about the role of biodiversity within these environments. Here, we study the impact of greening schoolyards, especially with regard to biodiversity enrichment, on children's behavior, emotion recognition, cognitive performance and mental effort, and attentional bias, compared to observations in control schools. Methods: This study employs an interventional design, including two intervention and two control schools located in Belgium and the Netherlands. Data was collected from 169 children aged 7-12 years, assessing cognitive performance using a battery of cognitive tasks combined with eye tracking, as well as socio-emotional wellbeing via eye tracking and validated questionnaires. Baseline measurements were followed up every 6 months for 2 years. Findings: Selective attention in the Stroop test and mental effort, as indicated by enlarged pupil diameters during cognitive tasks, increased more over time in the intervention group compared to the control group as schoolyard greening progressed. The intervention was associated with improved scores on prosocial behavior over time. These associations were independent of sex, age, country, education level of the household, the capacity to manage household incomes, and season. Attentional bias towards the emotion of happiness using eye-tracking did not show a significant difference in changes over time between intervention and control groups. Interpretation: These findings suggest that a green, more biodiverse school environment could improve children's cognitive and emotional functioning, highlighting the importance of designing schoolyard green spaces that enhance both nature contact and biodiversity as a valuable public health initiative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.