Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235178›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2025

Evaluating the Integration of Professional Nurse and Midwifery Advocacy Roles Within a Large Healthcare Organization: Assessing Service Utilization and Benefits-A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Naim Abdulmohdi, Andrea Tuckwell, Sally Goldspink, Hilary Engward, Nieky van Veggel, Marie Alexander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naim AbdulmohdiFaculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3818-965X
Andrea TuckwellEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Trust Offices, Colchester Hospital, Turner Road, Colchester CO4 5JL, Essex, UK.
Sally GoldspinkFaculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4265-2766
Hilary EngwardFaculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Rivermead Campus, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5419-7131
Nieky van VeggelFaculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Rivermead Campus, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6738-6989
Marie AlexanderEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Trust Offices, Colchester Hospital, Turner Road, Colchester CO4 5JL, Essex, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-5909-2065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: To assess nursing and midwifery staff's awareness, use, and perceived benefits of the professional advocate (PA) role in clinical practice. Background: Nursing and midwifery staff face growing challenges, including heavy workloads, burnout, and staff shortages. In response to rising attrition and dissatisfaction, the professional nurse advocate and professional midwifery advocate roles were introduced to provide professional support, improve working conditions, and enhance staff well-being. However, there is limited evidence on their effectiveness, particularly regarding staff retention and well-being. Study Design: This evaluation employed a mixed-methods approach across four phases. This paper focuses on Phase 2, which involved a cross-sectional, self-report survey of 407 nursing and midwifery staff. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire between October 2023 and January 2024. Findings: The study highlights significant gaps in awareness and access to PA services, with 64.9% of participants unaware of the role and 80.6% reporting no prior engagement. However, 95.3% expressed interest in future use, indicating strong positive attitudes toward the role and its support. Midwives reported greater familiarity with and access to PA services, likely due to longer exposure to the role, while nurses showed higher interest in repeated use. Informal communication channels, such as word-of-mouth, were prevalent, highlighting the need for more formal communication strategies. Participants valued the PA role for its emotional support, advocacy for staff rights, and career development, with confidentiality and accessibility identified as key priorities. Barriers to access included time constraints, concerns about confidentiality, and the need for greater organizational support. The PA role was perceived as empowering, positively influencing staff well-being and job satisfaction. Conclusions: Effective integration of PA services has the potential to empower nursing and midwifery staff, improving well-being and retention. Addressing access barriers and enhancing service delivery are essential to maximizing the impact of PA services in supporting staff well-being and professional growth.

Indexed as

MidwiferyNursesNurse's RolePatient AdvocacyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedNurse MidwivesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41235178
PMCPMC12611470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.