ArticleJournal of nursing management2025
Evaluating the Integration of Professional Nurse and Midwifery Advocacy Roles Within a Large Healthcare Organization: Assessing Service Utilization and Benefits-A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To assess nursing and midwifery staff's awareness, use, and perceived benefits of the professional advocate (PA) role in clinical practice. Background: Nursing and midwifery staff face growing challenges, including heavy workloads, burnout, and staff shortages. In response to rising attrition and dissatisfaction, the professional nurse advocate and professional midwifery advocate roles were introduced to provide professional support, improve working conditions, and enhance staff well-being. However, there is limited evidence on their effectiveness, particularly regarding staff retention and well-being. Study Design: This evaluation employed a mixed-methods approach across four phases. This paper focuses on Phase 2, which involved a cross-sectional, self-report survey of 407 nursing and midwifery staff. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire between October 2023 and January 2024. Findings: The study highlights significant gaps in awareness and access to PA services, with 64.9% of participants unaware of the role and 80.6% reporting no prior engagement. However, 95.3% expressed interest in future use, indicating strong positive attitudes toward the role and its support. Midwives reported greater familiarity with and access to PA services, likely due to longer exposure to the role, while nurses showed higher interest in repeated use. Informal communication channels, such as word-of-mouth, were prevalent, highlighting the need for more formal communication strategies. Participants valued the PA role for its emotional support, advocacy for staff rights, and career development, with confidentiality and accessibility identified as key priorities. Barriers to access included time constraints, concerns about confidentiality, and the need for greater organizational support. The PA role was perceived as empowering, positively influencing staff well-being and job satisfaction. Conclusions: Effective integration of PA services has the potential to empower nursing and midwifery staff, improving well-being and retention. Addressing access barriers and enhancing service delivery are essential to maximizing the impact of PA services in supporting staff well-being and professional growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.