Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235138›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2025

Effect of Oliceridine Combined with Sufentanil on Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia in Elderly Patients After Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Yifu Tian, Jiarui Hu, Haitao Pan, Guang Bai, Zhao Zhang, Peng Zhang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yifu TianDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Airport Economic Zone, Tianjin, 300308, People's Repulic of China.
Jiarui HuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Airport Economic Zone, Tianjin, 300308, People's Repulic of China.
Haitao PanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Airport Economic Zone, Tianjin, 300308, People's Repulic of China.
Guang BaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Airport Economic Zone, Tianjin, 300308, People's Repulic of China.
Zhao ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Airport Economic Zone, Tianjin, 300308, People's Repulic of China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Airport Economic Zone, Tianjin, 300308, People's Repulic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Currently, there is no report on the efficacy evaluation of oliceridine in patient - controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) for elderly patients after surgery. This study aims to investigate the analgesic effect of oliceridine combined with sufentanil under the PCIA treatment mode. Methods: A total of 112 patients were randomly assigned to the sufentanil group (Group S), the oliceridine group (Group O), and the oliceridine + sufentanil group (Group Z). Patients in Group S received 2.0 µg/kg sufentanil; those in Group O received 0.35 mg/kg oliceridine; and patients in Group Z received 1.0 µg/kg sufentanil + 0.35 mg/kg oliceridine. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain at rest and during activity within 48 hours after surgery were used as the primary outcome indicators. The secondary observation indicators include the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) score for postoperative sleep quality, the number of times the analgesia pump is pressed within 48 hours after surgery, the situation of rescue analgesia, and the occurrence of adverse events. Results: Among the 112 patients analyzed, the combination of oliceridine and sufentanil significantly reduced the VAS scores for pain at rest and during activity within 48 hours after surgery (p < 0.01), and had the lowest incidence rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and respiratory depression (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, this combination regimen significantly decreased the AIS scores (P < 0.001), the times of analgesia pump pressing (p < 0.01), the times of rescue analgesia (p < 0.05), and the rescue analgesia rate (P < 0.001). Conclusion: In the pain management after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer in elderly patients, oliceridine combined with sufentanil provides the best analgesic effect and has the lowest incidence of adverse reactions associated with opioids.

Indexed as

Analgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, OpioidLaparoscopyPostoperative PainRectal NeoplasmsSufentanilAdministration, IntravenousAgedAged, 80 and overDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidSufentanilelderly patientlaparoscopic surgeryoliceridinepatient-controlled intravenous analgesiavisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID41235138
PMCPMC12607661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.