SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Factors affecting the effectiveness and safety of colistin in treating drug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protective Effects of Ethyl Pyruvate and Rutin Hydrate Against Colistin-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Immunoassay for Colistin Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Colistin Methanesulfonate Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: As an important antibiotic for treating infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, colistin's clinical efficacy and safety might be influenced by multiple factors. This meta-analysis aimed to identify the key factors affecting the effectiveness and safety of colistin in treating these infections. The results of this study provide a reference for clinicians to choose treatment methods. At the same time, the rational use of colistin can prevent the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (AKI), improve the cure rate of patients, and delay the development of bacterial resistance. Methods: The overall mortality rate was designated as the primary effectiveness outcome, with clinical response rate and bacterial eradication rate serving as the secondary outcomes. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was evaluated as a safety endpoint. Key analytical variables included colistin dose (high-dose≥4.2 mg/kg/day and low-dose< 4.2 mg/kg/day), ACCI (low <5, moderate = five to six, high >6), co-therapy (carbapenems/tigecycline/fosfomycin, etc.), microbial species ( Results: A total of 74 studies (N = 8,889 participants) were included in our analysis. Mortality was lower in the high-dose group compared to the low-dose group (34.09% vs. 41.08%, p = 0.09). In ACCI score subgroups (low, moderate, high), mortality rates were 27.11% vs. 44.69% vs. 47.11% (p < 0.01). Monotherapy was associated with a higher mortality rate compared to co-therapy (42.97% vs. 33.10%, p < 0.01). Although no statistical differences were observed among different pathogenic bacteria species, infection caused by Conclusion: Loading dose, co-therapy (carbapenems or quinolones), microbial factors, and ACCI are the main factors associated with the effectiveness of colistin. Additionally, loading dose, microbial factors, ACCI, and co-therapy are associated with an increased risk of colistin-associated AKI. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/search, identifier CRD420250655507.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.