ArticleMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases2025
Dose-Attenuated-Polatuzumab Vedotine plus CHP vs. Dose-Attenuated -R-CHOP in Patients Aged ≥ 80 Years with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Stratified by Simplified Frailty Score.
Article in Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pola-R-CHP as frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and real-world evidence.Blood cancer journal · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy, toxicity, and prognostic factors of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Polatuzumab vedotin combined with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisolone (PRCHP) is a new standard first-line therapy; however, patients aged >80 years were excluded from the POLARIX trial. This single-center, retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of dose-attenuated PRCHP compared with those of dose-attenuated RCHOP in very elderly patients. Methods: A total of 63 participants aged 80 years or older were treated with PRCHP, and 76 were treated with RCHOP. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for baseline differences in Ann Arbor stage, international prognosis index, and frailty score. Results: After a 1:1 PSM matching, 59 patient pairs were selected (median age: 84 years). Patients were classified as fit (n= 9, 15%), unfit (n= 21, 36%), or frail (n= 29, 49%) based on their frailty scores. The overall response rate, complete response rate, overall survival, and progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 months were comparable between the dose-attenuated PRCHP and RCHOP groups. In patients with frailty, the 12-month PFS was comparable (50.9% vs. 53.7%); however, in non-frail patients, the PFS was higher in the dose-attenuated PRCHP group than that in the RCHOP group (80.8% vs. 60.1%, p=0.04). Safety profile of grade 3/4 adverse events was similar for both groups; however, peripheral neuropathy was prominent in the RCHOP group (p=0.06). Conclusion: Despite limitations-including the retrospective design, single-center setting, small sample size, and heterogeneous dose modifications-this study suggests that dose-attenuated PRCHP offers comparable efficacy and safety to dose-attenuated RCHOP in patients aged >80 years. PFS may be prolonged in non-frail patients receiving PRCHP, with a potentially lower risk of peripheral neuropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.