Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41235025›Full record

ReviewResearch (Washington, D.C.)2025

Next-Generation Neurotechnologies Inspired by Motor Primitive Model for Restoring Human Natural Movement.

Ze-Jian Chen, Xiao-Lin Huang, Nan Xia, Ming-Hui Gu, Jiang Xu, Min Lu, Hong Chen, Cai-Hua Xiong, Yong Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Robotic rehabilitation with the LokomatFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ze-Jian ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1688-0028
Xiao-Lin HuangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Nan XiaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Ming-Hui GuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Jiang XuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Min LuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Hong ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Cai-Hua XiongInstitute of Medical Equipment Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430374, China.
Yong ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in neuroengineering and artificial intelligence are transforming the landscape of motor rehabilitation, aiming to restore human movement as natural as possible. In recent decades, more advanced interventions are increasingly achievable via hybrid robotic systems, neuroprosthetics, and brain-computer interfaces. However, a fundamental gap of these neurotechnologies remains in modeling the complexity of neuromotor control, particularly how the central nervous system coordinates high-dimensional motor outputs in naturalistic behaviors. Rooted in theoretical neuroscience, the motor primitive (MP) model proposes an adaptable framework to deconstruct and reproduce motor tasks through low-dimensional modules. Interestingly, recent studies have indicated that the MP model may reform current-generation neurotechnologies by digitally shaping the course of human-machine interaction. In this narrative review, we will critically examine conventional target settings and identify their limitations in guiding biomimetic control in neurotechnologies. We then introduce the MP model with its machine learning and physiological scaffolds for better understanding and replicating human natural movement. Finally, we will present its potential in facilitating the next-generation neurotechnologies across kinematic, muscular, and neural domains. By modeling motor control in human and neuroengineering, we believe that the MP-inspired paradigms can initiate a new era of intelligent, patient-specific, and naturalistic motor restoration for various neurological and traumatic diseases.

Identifiers

PMID41235025
PMCPMC12606671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.