ReviewResearch (Washington, D.C.)2025
Next-Generation Neurotechnologies Inspired by Motor Primitive Model for Restoring Human Natural Movement.
Review in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skeletal Fiber Type in Muscle Pain and Dysfunction.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Robotic rehabilitation with the LokomatFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in neuroengineering and artificial intelligence are transforming the landscape of motor rehabilitation, aiming to restore human movement as natural as possible. In recent decades, more advanced interventions are increasingly achievable via hybrid robotic systems, neuroprosthetics, and brain-computer interfaces. However, a fundamental gap of these neurotechnologies remains in modeling the complexity of neuromotor control, particularly how the central nervous system coordinates high-dimensional motor outputs in naturalistic behaviors. Rooted in theoretical neuroscience, the motor primitive (MP) model proposes an adaptable framework to deconstruct and reproduce motor tasks through low-dimensional modules. Interestingly, recent studies have indicated that the MP model may reform current-generation neurotechnologies by digitally shaping the course of human-machine interaction. In this narrative review, we will critically examine conventional target settings and identify their limitations in guiding biomimetic control in neurotechnologies. We then introduce the MP model with its machine learning and physiological scaffolds for better understanding and replicating human natural movement. Finally, we will present its potential in facilitating the next-generation neurotechnologies across kinematic, muscular, and neural domains. By modeling motor control in human and neuroengineering, we believe that the MP-inspired paradigms can initiate a new era of intelligent, patient-specific, and naturalistic motor restoration for various neurological and traumatic diseases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.