ArticleCureus2025
Examining Gender Differences and the Impact of Additional Fourth Year Rotations on Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) Scores.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Emergency Medicine (EM) Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) is a critical component of the residency application process, yet questions remain regarding potential gender bias and the impact of repeated fourth-year rotations on applicant scores. This study examined gender differences in SLOE ratings and evaluated whether completing additional rotations influenced scores.
methodsA retrospective review of 243 SLOEs from 101 residents at a large urban academic EM residency program (2015-2021) was conducted, excluding non-EM evaluations and incomplete forms. SLOE items were converted to numerical scores for analysis. Independent-sample t-tests assessed gender differences across 10 quantitative questions, while one-way ANOVA evaluated differences in scores across first, second, and third sub-I rotations.
resultsFemale applicants received higher scores than male applicants on all 10 items, with statistically significant differences in four domains: ability to formulate a differential/treatment plan (2.41 vs. 2.20, p=0.008), ability to communicate a caring nature to patients (2.64 vs. 2.48, p=0.029), overall rotation grade (2.41 vs. 2.20, p=0.015), and estimated rank list position (2.78 vs. 2.54, p=0.04). No significant gender differences were observed in commitment to EM, teamwork, work ethic, or predicted success in residency. Comparison of fourth-year medical students' first, second, and third EM rotations (n=159) revealed no statistically significant differences across SLOE scores (p>0.05), although trends suggested the strongest overall performance during the first rotation.
conclusionFemale applicants received significantly higher ratings in select evaluative domains, consistent with prior research on gender-related variability in SLOEs. Additional rotations did not yield statistically significant improvements in scores, supporting current guidance that applicants should not complete more than two EM fourth-year rotations. These findings underscore the potential influence of home institution dynamics on early SLOE evaluations and support the need for greater standardization and transparency in evaluation practices to promote fairness and equity in the residency selection process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.