ArticleCureus2025
Fostering Reflection and Empathy: The Impact of Book Discussions on Medical Students' Education.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical education has traditionally emphasized biomedical knowledge and technical skills; however, developing humanistic competencies, such as empathy, ethical reasoning, and communication, is equally important. Integrating the humanities and social sciences into medical curricula has been proposed as a means of fostering these competencies. Book discussion groups provide an interactive learning environment that encourages reflection, critical thinking, and engagement with diverse perspectives. Despite growing interest, limited research has examined the specific benefits of such discussions in medical education. This study investigates the impact of a book discussion group involving medical students and faculty members on participants' perspectives, communication skills, and understanding of ethical and social issues.
methodA qualitative study was conducted at the Tottori University Faculty of Medicine from June 2020 to May 2022. A total of 19 book discussion sessions were held, with each session attended by one to nine students. Participants were required to read an assigned book before attending a 90- to 120-minute discussion, conducted primarily online. After each session, participants completed an anonymous online survey with open-ended questions about their experiences. Thematic analysis was performed to identify key themes.
resultsSix major themes emerged from the analysis: 1) exposure to diverse perspectives, 2) deepened personal reflection and articulation of thoughts, 3) enhanced understanding of complex themes, 4) creation of a psychologically safe discussion environment, 5) increased awareness of social and ethical issues, and 6) enjoyment and intellectual stimulation. Participants reported that the discussions helped them refine their critical thinking, broaden their viewpoints, and feel more comfortable expressing their thoughts.
conclusionBook discussions serve as a valuable complement to traditional medical education by fostering reflection, empathy, and ethical awareness. Incorporating such initiatives into medical curricula may enhance students' nontechnical competencies, ultimately contributing to the development of well-rounded, socially conscious physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.