Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234993›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Clinical Study on Mobility Outcomes After Surgical Fixation of Intertrochanteric and Shaft Femur Fractures.

Usman Ismail Khalid, Kainat Zafar, Syed Ahmad Bilal Bukhari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Usman Ismail KhalidTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, GBR.
Kainat ZafarPathology, Dr. Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, Karachi, PAK.
Syed Ahmad Bilal BukhariOrthopaedic Surgery, Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital EME Sector, Lahore, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemoral fractures are a major orthopedic burden with comprehensive implications on both the mobility and health care resources of the patient. Early rate of recovery and functional locomotion is the most significant in its ability to reduce hospitalization and maximize postoperative quality of life after surgical repair. This study was performed to compare early postoperative mobility, complications, and length of stays of intertrochanteric and femur shaft fracture patients undergoing surgery.

methodsThe prospective study consisted of 90 adults with isolated intertrochanteric or shaft femur fractures in a tertiary orthopedic unit over 18 months. The patients were assigned into two groups determined by the type of fracture: intertrochanteric fractures (n = 45) were undergoing treatment with dynamic hip screws, and shaft femur (n = 45) with intramedullary nailing. The PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) short form and Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) tests were used to evaluate mobility after three and six months of the surgery. Hospital stays and complications were also noted. The statistical analysis was conducted by SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) using chi-square, independent t-tests, and the Pearson correlation method. Statistical significance at p < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsNinety patients were taken (45 each group) with a mean age of 63.8 years, where the intertrochanteric group was older (66.1 vs. 61.5 years, p=0.038) but similar in sex and comorbidities. The difference in the mean PROMIS-PF 10a scores between intertrochanteric fracture and shaft fracture was significant after three and six months of follow-up (58.4 vs. 52.7, p=0.003, and 66.3 vs. 60.6, p=0.004). The TUG test results indicated quicker mobility times in the intertrochanteric group after three and six months (p=0.012 and p=0.007, respectively). The rates of complications were not different across the groups (five (11.1%) vs. six (13.3%), p=0.743), mainly postoperative wound infections, transfusion requirements, and delayed union. Intertrochanteric fracture patients spent less time in the hospital compared to shaft fracture patients; 7.2 ± 2.1 versus 9.0 ± 3.4 days (p=0.001).

conclusionBetter early mobility and reduced hospitalization rates are associated with the surgical fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures than shaft femur fractures. These findings suggest more specific rehabilitation guidelines and fracture-type-dependent counseling for patients.

Indexed as

femoral fracturesfracture fixationinternalmobility limitationpostoperative complicationstreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID41234993
PMCPMC12611444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.