ArticleCureus2025
Metastatic Melanoma in a Retinoblastoma Survivor: Can Immunohistochemistry Save the Day?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinoblastoma (Rb) is a rare pediatric ocular malignancy, typically diagnosed before the age of five, with unilateral or bilateral presentation. We report the complex case of a 43-year-old female patient with an oncological family history suggestive of hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome that included multiple malignancies: Rb in her great-grandmother and sister, colonic adenocarcinoma in her grandfather, and pulmonary carcinoma in her father. She was diagnosed with bilateral Rb in childhood and achromic melanoma at the age of 40, with 1.9 mm Breslow thickness, ulceration, and brisk inflammatory infiltrate, staged as pT2b. Furthermore, an axillary lymph node tumor was excised and histologically displayed malignant proliferation of small- to medium-sized cells with high mitotic activity, necrosis, vascular invasion, and neurotropism. Immunohistochemistry was required to determine histogenesis and comprised diffuse p16, SOX10, pan melanoma positivity, mild preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) expression, and negativity for epithelial, neuroendocrine, hematopoietic, and other lineage markers, while Ki-67 was positive in 50% of tumor nuclei. The BRAF mutation testing was negative; therefore, the final diagnosis was cutaneous achromic melanoma with lymph node metastasis, the small-cell type. Retinoblastoma survivors face increased melanoma risk, especially of second cancers. This report highlights the necessity of regular dermatological surveillance and the diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in identifying metastases from melanomas occurring in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.