ArticleCureus2025
The Contradiction of a Benign Metastatic Meningioma: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracranial metastatic meningiomas are an extremely rare type of metastatic meningiomas. They are often asymptomatic and found incidentally on imaging. In this report, we discuss a young lady who presented with atypical chest pains, in whom initial work-up demonstrated a lesion in the left lung which was subsequently surgically resected. There was some confusion regarding whether the lesion was a primary pulmonary meningioma or a metastasising meningioma, both of which present similarly on histology with spindle or oval-shaped cells arranged in whorls. Further analysis revealed that this lesion belonged to a rare subgroup called 'benign metastasising meningioma', where the histology does not show the characteristic features of a metastatic lesion (such as high mitotic rate or evidence of necrosis). In fact, this lesion was found to have no necrosis, patternless growth, nuclear atypia or lymphovascular invasion and minimal mitoses occurring rarely despite metastasising from the meninges. This finding triggered further investigations in the form of brain imaging, which identified recurrence of a left central meningioma (a slow-growing tumour arising from the meninges on the left side of the brain), which was successfully treated 11 years previously. Neurosurgical intervention is currently being planned. Pulmonary meningiomas are extremely rare. In a patient with a history of a central nervous system meningioma, a pulmonary meningioma should be investigated further to assess whether the lesion is a primary or secondary metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.