Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234980›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Enhancing Neurology Clerkship Training With Problem-Based Learning and the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX).

Yingfang She

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yingfang SheNeurology Medicine Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, CHN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurology clerkships are a critical stage in medical education, where students must connect theoretical knowledge with clinical practice. Traditional methods often fall short in developing clinical reasoning, procedural skills, and professional competencies.

objectiveThis review examines the potential of combining problem-based learning (PBL) with the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) to strengthen neurology clerkship training.

methodsWe conducted a narrative review of recent studies on PBL and mini-CEX in neurology and related fields, including evidence from systematic reviews, randomized trials, and observational research.

resultsPBL enhances knowledge, self-directed learning, and engagement. Mini-CEX provides structured, real-time assessment with immediate feedback. When used together, they show synergistic benefits in other specialties, improving exam performance, clinical reasoning, communication, and learner satisfaction. Key challenges include faculty workload, rating variability, and limited neurology-specific evidence.

conclusionsIntegrating PBL with mini-CEX offers a competency-based approach to neurology clerkships. Early evidence supports its feasibility and educational value, but further undergraduate-focused studies are needed. Successful implementation will depend on careful design, faculty training, and institutional support.

Indexed as

clinical clerkshipcompetency-based educationmedical educationmini-cexneurologyproblem-based learning

Identifiers

PMID41234980
PMCPMC12610003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.