ArticleCureus2025
Severity-Dependent Peripheral Circulatory Responses to Neuroprosthetic Functional Electrical Stimulation in Chronic Stroke: A Four-Week Time Course Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Chronic hemiplegia after stroke often results in disuse of the paretic limb, impaired peripheral circulation, and cold sensation. While functional electrical stimulation (FES) has been studied for motor recovery, its circulatory effects remain less explored. Neuroprosthetic FES (NP-FES), which delivers stimulation synchronized with voluntary electromyography (EMG) activity, may provide additional vascular benefits. This feasibility study aimed to evaluate whether NP-FES can induce observable changes in peripheral circulation in a day rehabilitation setting and whether response timelines differ between severe and mild hemiplegia. Methods Sixteen chronic stroke patients (eight severe, Brunnstrom ≤2; 8 mild, ≥5) participated in a randomized crossover trial. Each participant underwent four weeks of NP-FES and four weeks of sensory stimulation, separated by a two-week washout. Estimated blood flow (Q) was modeled from venous vessel width (VVW), skin surface temperature (Skin_Temp), and estimated hemoglobin (Hb) value. Assessments were performed pre-, post-, and 3 minutes post-stimulation at baseline, week 2, and week 4. Analyses included paired t-tests with Bonferroni correction and Bayes factors. Results No carryover effects were observed. In the severe group, NP-FES significantly increased Q at week 4, accompanied by an increased contribution of venous vessel width. In the mild group, sensory stimulation produced significant improvements as early as week 2. Subjective improvements, including enhanced limb awareness, initiation of use, and, in some cases, reduced cold sensation, were reported by 50% of patients with severe cases and 75% of mild cases. Conclusions Peripheral circulatory responses to NP-FES can be feasibly detected in clinical rehabilitation practice. The distinct timelines observed-four weeks for severe cases and two weeks for mild cases-suggest severity-specific expectations for circulation-based outcomes. These findings highlight feasibility rather than definitive efficacy and provide direction for future randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.