ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Efficacy of health ecology-based health education on early rehabilitation outcomes in stroke patients.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke is a leading global cause of disability and mortality in adults, and early rehabilitation is critical for improving patients' functional recovery and quality of life; however, conventional rehabilitation models often focus solely on medical interventions and overlook the impact of the patient's comprehensive ecological environment on recovery, making it necessary to explore more holistic intervention approaches. To investigate the efficacy of health ecology theory-based health education in early stroke rehabilitation and its impacts on neurological/motor/cognitive function, psychological status, and metabolic biomarkers. Methods: A total of 150 stroke patients during June-October 2024 were randomized into control and intervention groups based on interventions. Outcomes assessed included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) for neurological deficit, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for motor function, Modified Barthel Index (MBI) for activities of daily living, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for cognition, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for psychological status, and metabolic biomarkers glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to analyze path relationships among metabolic_indices, recovery_effect, and mental_status. Results: The intervention group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in NIHSS, FMA, MoCA, HbA1c, and LDL-C. Multivariate linear regression models showed moderate-to-substantial explanatory power, particularly for LDL-C and HbA1c (adjusted R Conclusion: Health ecology-based health education effectively improves neurological/motor/cognitive function and metabolic control during early stroke rehabilitation. The intervention establishes a "physiological-psychological-social" virtuous cycle through multidimensional effects, providing an innovative framework for collaborative stroke recovery management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.