ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Radiomics-based machine learning for glioma grade classification: a multicenter study with SHapley Additive exPlanations interpretability analysis.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating handcrafted and deep learning MRI signatures: an interpretable framework for predicting chemotherapy benefit in glioma.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Beyond binary classification: a pilot study of imaging-derived glioma severity modeling using T1-weighted and diffusion MRI radiomics.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Interpretable ADC-based radiomics models for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accurate preoperative grading of gliomas is critical for guiding therapeutic strategies and prognostic assessment. This study aimed to develop and validate a robust, interpretable machine learning (ML) model based on multicenter magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics data for predicting the World Health Organization (WHO) grade in glioma patients. Methods: We collected MRI data from 905 glioma patients diagnosed between 2005-2024 across three independent cohorts. Data from 329 of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) patients served as training (n=230) and internal testing (n=99) sets, while data from 482 University of California San Francisco (UCSF) patients and 94 Nantong University Affiliated Hospital (NTUA) patients served as external validation sets. Radiomics features were extracted from preoperative T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI. Ten ML methods, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were compared using recursive feature elimination (RFE) with cross-validation. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used for the model interpretability analysis. Results: Among the 10 ML models, XGBoost performed best with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.983 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.968-0.996] in the training set, 0.897 (95% CI: 0.836-0.956) in the internal testing set, and 0.834 (95% CI: 0.766-0.883) in the UCSF cohort and 0.880 (95% CI: 0.771-0.974) in the NTUA cohort. The model achieved an accuracy of 82.3-94.3%, significantly outperforming conventional imaging assessment. The calibration analysis showed excellent agreement (Hosmer-Lemeshow P>0.05) with a maximum net benefit of 0.42. The SHAP analysis identified 12 optimal features, primarily texture heterogeneity measures from Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) and wavelet transforms, as key predictors of glioma grade. Conclusions: We successfully developed and validated a robust, interpretable radiomics-based model that accurately predicts glioma WHO grade preoperatively. Its promising performance across diverse datasets suggests potential for clinical translation, though prospective validation in real-world clinical workflows is required to confirm clinical utility and assess impact on treatment decisions and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.