Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234841›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2025

Ultrasound and immunohistochemical predictors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer.

Yanqiang Ma, Yangyang Zhu, Jiali Zhu, Fang Nie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanqiang MaDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8758-5037
Yangyang ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jiali ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Fang NieDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become a crucial treatment strategy for breast cancer. However, responses to NAC vary significantly among patients-while some achieve a pathological complete response (pCR), others exhibit limited efficacy. Therefore, identifying reliable preoperative predictors of NAC response is essential for optimizing personalized treatment decisions. This study aims to: (I) evaluate the predictive value of preoperative ultrasound characteristics in combination with immunohistochemical markers for NAC efficacy in breast cancer patients; (II) identify key indicators that synergistically enhance predictive accuracy; and (III) provide a comprehensive and practical foundation for clinical decision-making. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed breast cancer patients who underwent NAC at The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from October 2020 to December 2023. Postoperative pathology was graded using the Miller-Payne system, with grades 4-5 classified as the effective group and grades 1-3 as the ineffective group. Preoperative ultrasound features and immunohistochemical markers from core needle biopsy-estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki-67 proliferation index-were compared between the two groups. Variables showing statistical significance in univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model to develop a predictive nomogram. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The optimal cutoff point was determined by the maximum Youden index, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were recorded. Results: A total of 101 patients were included: 56 (55.45%) in the effective group and 45 (44.55%) in the ineffective group. PR expression was significantly associated with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification (P=0.03). Univariate analysis showed significant differences between groups in Ki-67, ER, PR, and ultrasound-measured lesion reduction after chemotherapy (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified negative PR status [odds ratio (OR): 0.18, P=0.01], unifocal lesions (OR: 0.26, P=0.04), and lesion reduction after chemotherapy (OR: 8.16, P=0.02) as independent predictors of favorable NAC response. The model achieved an AUC of 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-0.80]. At the optimal cutoff, the maximum Youden index was 0.46, with a sensitivity of 0.70 and a specificity of 0.76. Conclusions: Preoperative ultrasound characteristics and immunohistochemical markers in breast cancer patients exhibit significant predictive value for NAC efficacy, providing valuable insights to guide clinical treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Breast cancerimmunohistochemical markersneoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41234841
PMCPMC12605243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.