Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234793›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

A mathematical model for optimal breakaways in cycling: balancing energy expenditure and crash risk.

Javier Chico-Vázquez, Ian M Griffiths

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Javier Chico-VázquezMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7536-6978
Ian M GriffithsMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6882-7977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a mathematical model for optimizing breakaway strategies in competitive cycling, balancing power expenditure, aerodynamic drag and crashing. Our framework incorporates probabilistic crash dynamics, allowing a cyclist's risk tolerance to shape optimal tactics. We define an objective function that accounts for both finish time differences and the probability of crashing, which we optimize subject to an energy expenditure constraint. We demonstrate the methodology for a flat stage with a simple constant-power breakaway. We then extend this analysis to account for fatigue-driven power decay and varying terrain and race conditions. We highlight the importance of strategy by demonstrating that carefully planned decision making can lead to a race win even when the energy expenditure is low. Our results highlight and quantify the fact that, at the elite level, success often depends as much on minimizing risk as on maximizing physical output.

Indexed as

breakawaycompetitive cyclingcrashingmathematical modelling

Identifiers

PMID41234793
PMCPMC12606252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.