ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Generalizing an outbreak cluster detection method for two groups: an application to rabies.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Generalizing an outbreak cluster detection method for two groups: an application to rabies.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying linked cases of an infectious disease can improve our understanding of its epidemiology by distinguishing sustained local transmission from frequent introductions with little onward transmission. This evidence can, in turn, inform decisions on interventions. Knowledge of epidemiological distributions and reporting probabilities is key in identifying linked cases. However, with multi-host pathogens quantitative differences between hosts may need consideration. In this study, an existing graph-based approach to detecting outbreak clusters was extended to allow for group-specific reporting probabilities and epidemiological distributions and to assess the level and importance of assortative mixing. This method was applied to data on animal rabies cases in Tanzania. Group-specific differences in reporting probabilities and epidemiological distributions and the level of assortative mixing had a marked impact on the size and composition of clusters. Results of the rabies cases analysis supported higher reporting probabilities in domestic animals than wildlife, no difference in mean transmission distance between groups, and frequent inter-species transmission. The method described here could be applied to other multi-host or multi-group systems in which heterogeneities in reporting probabilities, distributional parameters and/or levels of mixing exist between groups. This would allow more accurate characterization of transmission dynamics and thus facilitate implementation of more effective interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.