ArticleAnnals of thoracic medicine
The effect of incentive spirometry with early pulmonary rehabilitation on hospital stay of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation.
Article in Annals of thoracic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reducing the complications from community acquired pneumonia: a review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncentive spirometry (IS) is a cost-effective, easy-to-use, and accessible device used peri-postoperative period for prevention or management of complications via maintaining maximum inhalation and open collapsed alveoli and resolving atelectasis. Although early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is known to reduce the length of stay (LOS), it is controversial whether the addition of IS provides a further contribution. This study aimed to investigate whether using IS in addition to early PR in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation reduces LOS and whether it is a safe technique by assessing hemodynamic responses.
methodsOne hundred thirty patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) during hospitalization were randomized to an early PR group and an additional IS group (PR + IS). LOS (days), pre-, and postsession hemodynamic responses were recorded.
resultsThe LOS was significantly lower in the PR + IS (5.34 days) group than in the PR group (7.17 days) (
conclusionThe usage of IS in addition to early PR in patients with AECOPD reduced LOS by approximately 1 day compared to PR alone. Furthermore, no significant signs of intolerance were observed, suggesting that IS was well-tolerated, similar to PR alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.