ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting STAS in stage I lung adenocarcinoma with part-solid and solid nodules: a two-center study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to preoperatively predict spread through air spaces (STAS) in stage I lung adenocarcinoma presenting as part-solid and solid nodules by leveraging clinical features and machine learning models, thereby guiding surgical decision-making and enhancing patient counseling. Methods: A total of 473 patients were retrospectively enrolled, including 353 from our center and 120 from an validation cohort. Predictive features were selected using maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms. Seven machine learning models-logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and category boosting (CatBoost)-were developed and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Feature importance was assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). A web-based nomogram was constructed for clinical application. Result: STAS was present in 44.76% of the training set and 50.83% of the validation cohort. Seven predictors were selected to construct the predictive models. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.889 (95% CI, 0.852-0.926) in training and 0.856 (95% CI, 0.789-0.928) in validation. The calibration curves in training and validation set exhibited good agreement between the predictions and actual observations. The Decision Curve Analyses (DCA) provide significant clinical utility. SHAP analysis identified the most important predictors for STAS as CEA, vascular convergence, proGRP, age, AFP, smoking history, and CTR. Conclusion: The XGBoost model provides robust preoperative prediction of STAS and may assist clinicians in optimizing surgical strategies for patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.