SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Antibody-drug conjugates in HER2-positive advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging therapy for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC), yet their comparative efficacy and safety remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of different ADCs in this patient population. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was performed to identify relevant studies. The primary endpoint was the pooled overall response rate (ORR), analyzed using a random-effects model. Safety, subgroup analyses, and publication bias were also assessed. Results: Twelve studies comprising 1041 patients were included. The pooled ORR across all ADCs was 33.4% (95% CI, 26.3%-41.3%). Efficacy varied substantially among agents: trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and DP303c demonstrated the highest ORRs (42.5% and 42.9%, respectively), whereas others, such as Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), showed lower efficacy (20.6%). ORR was not significantly affected by prior treatment lines (P = 0.6559) or cohort type (P = 0.7185). The most common adverse events included nausea (47.7%), with grade ≥3 anemia (21.1%) and neutropenia (15.1%) being the most frequent severe toxicities. Conclusions: The efficacy of ADCs in HER2-positive AGC is highly variable. T-DXd and DP303c appear to be the most active agents, underscoring the critical importance of specific drug selection. Managing toxicities such as anemia and neutropenia is essential for optimizing treatment. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420250653886, identifier PROSPERO CRD420250653886.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.