ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Real-world efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is associated with high mortality and limited treatment options. While PD-1/PD-L1-targeted immunotherapy has shown promise, clinical trial results may not fully represent real-world outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study at Shangluo Central Hospital analyzed 116 patients with ESCC treated with PD-1 inhibitors from April 2021 to December 2023. Data were collected from electronic records to assess clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR), as well as factors associated with treatment response and toxicity. Results: The cohort had a median age of 66 years, with 86.2% male patients and 71.5% smokers. The majority of patients had advanced disease (stage III: 49.1%, stage IV: 29.3%). The ORR was 40.5%, with 1.7% achieving complete response and 38.8% partial response. The DCR was 81%. The median PFS was 13.6 months, and the median OS was not reached. Better outcomes were associated with age <70 years, ECOG performance status 0/1, fewer than two metastatic organs, and first-line treatment. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 10 out of 116 patients (8.6%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 4 patients (3.4%), including cutaneous capillary hemangioma (n=3, 2.6%) and dyspnea (n=1, 0.9%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated notable efficacy and manageable toxicity for ESCC. Younger patients, those with better performance status, and fewer metastases achieved better outcomes. Larger, multi-center studies with biomarker analysis are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.