ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Informing relatives of non-surviving patients about research participation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, it is not common UK practice to actively inform relatives of non-surviving patients about enrolment in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) trials. However, in the US and elsewhere, researchers routinely notify relatives at the earliest opportunity. We assessed the process of writing to relatives of non-surviving patients enrolled in the Prehospital Optimal Shock Energy for Defibrillation (POSED) study. Methods: This prospective, non-randomised cohort study was a sub-study of the POSED randomised controlled trial. Together with public and patient partners, we developed a condolence letter, minimising the burden of information whilst offering support and further information. Next of kin contact details were verified using two independent sources. Acceptability was assessed by monitoring enquiries or complaints received. We recorded time taken to gather details, discordance between sources and number of cases where we could not obtain details. Results: We sent letters to 18/33 (55 %) of relatives. Fifteen letters were not sent because we could not obtain relative's details (n = 5), could not verify with another source (n = 3), found discordance between sources (n = 5), or the agreed time window had passed (n = 2). The median time spent per case was 27 min (IQR 20-40). No enquiries or complaints were received. Conclusions: Identifying the next of kin for individuals who did not survive OHCA was challenging and required significant resources. However, no comments or complaints were received from relatives who were sent information about trial participation. Trial registration number: ISRCTN16327029.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.