ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
LESS-Net: a lightweight network for epistaxis image segmentation using similarity-based contrastive learning.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatially decoupled reliable mutual learning for semi-supervised medical image segmentation.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate automated segmentation of epistaxis (nosebleeds) from endoscopic images is critical for clinical diagnosis but is significantly hampered by the scarcity of annotated data and the inherent difficulty of precise lesion delineation. These challenges are particularly pronounced in resource-constrained healthcare environments, creating a pressing need for data-efficient deep learning solutions. Methods: To address these limitations, we developed LESS-Net, a lightweight, semi-supervised segmentation framework. LESS-Net is designed to effectively leverage unlabeled data through a novel combination of consistency regularization and contrastive learning, which mitigates data distribution mismatches and class imbalance. The architecture incorporates an efficient MobileViT backbone and introduces a multi-scale feature fusion module to enhance segmentation accuracy beyond what is achievable with traditional skip-connections. Results: Evaluated on a public Nasal Bleeding dataset, LESS-Net significantly outperformed seven state-of-the-art models. With only 50% of the data labeled, our model achieved a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 82.51%, a Dice coefficient of 75.62%, and a mean Recall of 92.12%, while concurrently reducing model parameters by 73.8%. Notably, this semi-supervised performance surpassed that of all competitor models trained with 100% labeled data. The framework's robustness was further validated at extremely low label ratios of 25% and 5%. Conclusion: Ablation studies confirmed the distinct contribution of each architectural component to the model's overall efficacy. LESS-Net provides a powerful and data-efficient framework for medical image segmentation. Its demonstrated ability to achieve superior performance with limited supervision highlights its substantial potential to enhance AI-driven diagnostic capabilities and improve patient care in real-world clinical workflows, especially in underserved settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.