ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Enhancing Healing with Noncontact Low-Frequency Ultrasound in Fingertip Amputation Treatment: A Comparative Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Acute traumatic fingertip amputations are common injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of noncontact low-frequency ultrasound (NCLF-US) as adjunctive therapy for treatment of fingertip amputations. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients with an acute traumatic fingertip amputation without exposed bone between February 2022 and April 2023. Exclusions included vascular disease, active infection, surgical intervention, primary closure, or subsequent trauma. Patients received either NCLF-US therapy combined with local wound care or local wound care alone (LWCA). Data collected included age, sex assigned at birth, history of diabetes, and injury dimensions. Data were used to assess cohort demographics, injury characteristics, and clinical course. Nominal and continuous variables were analyzed using Fisher exact test and Student Results: Among 19 digits, nine were treated with NCLF-US, and ten received LWCA. There was no considerable difference between cohorts in terms of age, sex, or history of diabetes. The NCLF-US cohort presented with an average wound size of 434.7 mm Conclusions: The NCLF-US cohort exhibited larger initial fingertip amputations, while demonstrating a time to healing nine times faster than those treated solely with local wound care. These findings are encouraging and offer initial support for the consideration of NCLF-US as an adjunctive therapy for treatment of fingertip amputations. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.