ArticleDigital health
Exploring digital health literacy among Tanzanian primary care workers: A qualitative study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction/Objectives: Digital health literacy (DHL) is increasingly recognised as a core competency for frontline health workers in digitalising health systems, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This study examined how Tanzanian primary care workers understand and apply DHL, as well as the contextual factors that influence its development and use. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was used. In-depth interviews were conducted with 30 health workers, including nurses, clinical officers, and community health workers, from urban and rural public primary healthcare facilities in the Dodoma region. Data were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke's framework, supported by NVivo 15. Results: Three main themes emerged: (a) varied conceptualisations of DHL, ranging from basic operational use to applied understanding for clinical decision-making and patient education; (b) DHL's influence on data quality, care continuity, and patient communication; and (c) disparities shaped by infrastructure, cadre, training access, and organisational culture. Rural staff and community health workers reported lower DHL and less access to support. Conclusions: Improving DHL requires not only technical training but also ongoing mentorship, supportive organisational cultures, and equity-focused strategies. Tailored interventions are needed to build DHL capacity across all cadres and facility levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.