Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234616›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Exploring digital health literacy among Tanzanian primary care workers: A qualitative study.

Augustino Mwogosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Augustino MwogosiDepartment of Information Systems and Technology, University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0159-6163

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction/Objectives: Digital health literacy (DHL) is increasingly recognised as a core competency for frontline health workers in digitalising health systems, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This study examined how Tanzanian primary care workers understand and apply DHL, as well as the contextual factors that influence its development and use. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was used. In-depth interviews were conducted with 30 health workers, including nurses, clinical officers, and community health workers, from urban and rural public primary healthcare facilities in the Dodoma region. Data were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke's framework, supported by NVivo 15. Results: Three main themes emerged: (a) varied conceptualisations of DHL, ranging from basic operational use to applied understanding for clinical decision-making and patient education; (b) DHL's influence on data quality, care continuity, and patient communication; and (c) disparities shaped by infrastructure, cadre, training access, and organisational culture. Rural staff and community health workers reported lower DHL and less access to support. Conclusions: Improving DHL requires not only technical training but also ongoing mentorship, supportive organisational cultures, and equity-focused strategies. Tailored interventions are needed to build DHL capacity across all cadres and facility levels.

Indexed as

Digital health literacyhealth information systemshealth workersprimary healthcarequalitative researchTanzania

Identifiers

PMID41234616
PMCPMC12605890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.